THE CRISIS IN JUSTICE: WILL INDEPENDENT ADVOCATES FOR RAPE VICTIMS MAKE ANY DIFFERENCE? Paul Harris The new government have had their first party conference. And for those waiting for some clue about solving the justice crisis there was little other...
Head of Crown Court Team and Partner, Natalie Berman who was instructed by one of our Partners Kirsty Bishop successfully argue for exceptional circumstances in a peculiar firearms case where the mandatory minimum applied.
Our client faced a 2- count indictment, possessing a prohibited firearm (contrary to section 5(1)(b) of the Firearms Act 1968) and possessing a prohibited firearm – pepper cartridges (contrary to section 5(1)(c) of the Firearms Act 1968). Peculiarly, the firearm did not attract a minimum sentence, but rather the seven pepper cartridges.
The Law is such that a court must impose a custodial sentence of at least five years unless the court is of the opinion that there are exceptional circumstances which related to the offence or offender and justify not imposing the minimum sentence.
Following the preparation of a detailed sentencing note, supported by expert evidence and character material, and supplemented with additional oral submissions at the hearing, the Judge found there were exceptional circumstances in the case resulting in a non-custodial sentence.
For further advice, please get in touch by calling 0207 790 4032 (for out of hours, please call 07841 454 170) or by emailing main@efbw.co.uk